Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Point of Contention (with the Deer-Leader)

Daily Yomiuri front page for Monday, March 7.
Top Headline:

CHINA MILITARY BUDGET TO LEAP 18% IN 2007
Compiled from news services
BEIJING -- China's military spending, a point of contention with the United States, will jump 17.8% this year, a spokesman for the National People's Congress said Sunday.
China's military spending is an obsession for Japan and the US, especially the Cheneys, even though as the world's most populous country, China has a relatively small military budget and has not projected power beyond its neighbors Korea and Vietnam since the 1948 revolution. Consider that it has a population about double that of the US and Europe combined, and that it borders over a dozen countries which include nuclear-armed Russia, nuclear-armed India, nuclear-armed Pakistan, and possibly-nuclear-armed DPRK. Meanwhile, the US has the sacred right to arm itself to the teeth in order to defend itself against the ever-present risk of invasion from Canada and Mexico.

Aside from that, notice that the first sentence reports it from the US point of view, not as an objective fact. They literally cannot write one sentence with putting the US ruling elite's perspective in. This is very odd since it is a Japanese newspaper reporting on China, which should have nothing to do with the US.

Is the US news ever reported that way? Of course not. Have you read "Donald Rumsfeld, in a move applauded by the Chinese leadership, was replaced today."? That would be very odd reporting. But that is what we have every day.

This is compiled from AP and AFP-Jiji(!) wire services, so either they phrased it that way, or the writers at the Yomiuri are such good imperialist subjects that they spontaneously embedded their submissive fascist thinking into the story unconsciously or consciously.

The story has nothing whatsoever to do with the United States. They might as well interject about how the pope, Al Capone, or the Dear Leader feels about it. You would recognize it as propaganda if the newspaper said Stalin, the Central Committee, or Chairman Mao will be sure to disapprove of this news. Most people are so brainwashed that they will read that and not even consciously notice how they are being told what to think. People in the Soviet Union and China had to learn how to read between the lines of the official media, and we need to learn that the official media (the organs of state power) can be those which are privately operated for profit, too.

If the writers were to add how American neocons such as Mr Cheney or Rumsfeld had spoken out to warn of a danger of rising Chinese militarism --which we have no evidence of-- that should be several paragraphs further down in the article.

INCONVENIENT TRUTH, ANimals

Al Gore's Oscar-award winning film An Inconvenient Truth has been released on DVD, but has not been released in Japan as a film or dvd, at least to my knowledge. Amazon.co.jp had only a few US editions of the dvd. I asked a friend to bring me a copy from the US and created a locally viewable region-free version for personal archival research promotional purposes only. Disclaimer: decoding even a single bit or letter from a dvd before the media conglomerates decide it has been "released" in your dvd zone may result in severe penalties and may not technically be "legal" even if you follow the precaution of doing so in international airspace, Antarctica, or from outside Earth orbit.

It is a good film, mixing autobiographical segments of Al Gore's life into documentary segments about global warming, while subtly promoting the Apple PowerBook and Keynote presentation software. The Al Gore parts do support the main points of the movie, but it would be better if there were an alternate version on the dvd which cut out Al Gore's boyhood reminiscences so it could be shown in classrooms as a straight-up educational documentary. There is a little too much of Al Gore in it now to be able to do that without controversy in, say, a Kansas science classroom. I like (shadow) President Gore, and support his re-election with a Supreme-Court-coup-resistant super-majority of voters next time, but not everyone is as crazy about the Al Gore Rhythm as I am.

There was something vaguely familiar about the cover art. Finally I realized that it was a blatantly subliminal rip-off of the 1976 Pink Floyd album cover for ANIMALS, designed by Hipgnosis, which caused nightmares for British air traffic controllers and vegans. Shocking, isn't it?

I think the dvd cover could be improved by adding the flying pig, for the "hip" or "hep cat" effect among market demographic segments old enough to remember the late 1970s, vinyl, and 8-track. Naturally, the package should be square, not rectangular. Either round or square. No triangles or rectangles, please. This is a dvd after all. Finally, get all that annoying text and blather about how it doesn't matter if you are a replicant or a demigogue liberite conversative mindchange nanoparticle blah blah blah out of there. Do we have to assume people don't know what the product is unless it is written there? They didn't need letters for Animals in 1976; why should we need them now? Actually, since most people no longer read, words just get in the way, and mess up the image. Plus you wouldn't have to localize the language for all the international releases, if there ever are any.

This much-improved prototype cover goes out as a suggested alternate version.

I must leave to soundsmiths geekier than I the more technically challenging task of remixing the movie soundtrack so as to incorporate the entire album of Pink Floyd's Animals.

NATO - Forty thousand more years!


Keepin' it real since the late Pleistocene epoch.

Monday, March 05, 2007

The Corporation soundtrack & more free music

Even before downloading the movie, I grabbed the official soundtrack for The Corporation, composed by Leonard J. Paul. It is available from two sites, Kikapu or the Internet Archive. The liner notes are a great insight into the composer's creative process, and the audio is released with cover art.

While at the Internet Archive, I visited the Live Music Archive and looked up a few concerts. I found that the collection had grown. I downloaded some recent shows by 311, Cowboy Junkies, Rusted Root, Death Cab for Cutie, String Cheese Incident, Dear Leader, and Blues Traveler. I think it is the first time to add those last three artists to my collection. I just chose Dear Leader from their name and because they had a fair number of concerts available. They are not bad, a good discovery. Found out more at last.fm. Similar to The Corporation, downloading a zipped folder of the entire show encoded as variable bit rate mp3s seemed like the best file choice to me. Most of the ID3 tags were in order most of the time, except year and genre. Too bad there are no jpegs of the live shows bundled in there.

I could be wrong, but I get the feeling that the Live Music Archive isn't terribly popular. That could be good if the artists worry less about the massive availability of recorded shows diminishing demand for live performance tickets. I don't think they approach it that way, more as promotion for the concert. Note that many of the bands such as SCI, RR, and CJ are known for doing good live shows. You do need to have your lo-fi toleration filter turned up to get into these; the audio is as bad as a real life show, only without the visuals.

The Corporation + Manufacturing Consent

A friend informed me that the 1992 Canadian documentary, Manufacturing Consent, about Noam Chomsky, has been released in Japan and is being shown in Shibuya (#25). He also told me that the wikipedia page of Chomsky's political side is also getting built up and may be a good starting point for people who haven't read his writing. It has links to the most useful Chomsky sites.

Unable or unwilling to attend a screening, (and since maybe it is a movie that is better on DVD anyway,) I found that another Canadian documentary, The Corporation, by the same director and producer, Mark Ackbar, had been released by the filmmaker on bittorrent for free download (mininova, for example). I used a considerable amount of bandwidth this weekend slowly pulling it down. (By the way, NeoOffice, OpenOffice, and Ubuntu 6.10 are other free wares you could find and legally download from bittorrent.) The legal download includes an interview with author Joel Bakan by Sam Seder and co-host Janeane Garofalo of The Majority Report on AirAmerica Radio. This avi file is videoed rather amateurly (in my amateur opinion) and adds another 400 MB to the two 700 MB files which make up the movie. It is not so bad to have the extra as video, even though it could have been audio, but it should have just been compressed to something like 100 MB. It may be nice if you are a fan of the show and want to see them doing the radio interview, and have broadband, but it probably added another 10 hours to my download time, and I could hear the iLamp's fan going full power all day and night.


Saturday, March 03, 2007

US-backed post-war fascism on 3 continents

Last week Dick Cheney refused to meet with Japanese Defense Minister Kyuma. Japan has sent troops to Iraq (they finished their mission successfully) and brought them home, but Kyuma was just not Right enough for Cheney.

That information took on a different meaning this week with the news that the US CIA considered a coup de etat against pro-American Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida in 1952. It seems he just wasn't right enough for the anti-communists who the US was strengthening as cold war fodder.

By JOSEPH COLEMAN
The Associated Press

Declassified documents reveal that Japanese ultranationalists with ties to U.S. military intelligence plotted to overthrow the Japanese government and assassinate the prime minister in 1952.

The scheme -- which was abandoned -- was concocted by militarists and suspected war criminals who had worked for U.S. Occupation authorities after World War II, according to CIA records reviewed by AP. The plotters wanted a rightwing government that would rearm Japan.

The CIA files, declassified in 2005 and publicized by the U.S. National Archives in January, detail a plot to oust the pro-U.S. prime minister, Shigeru Yoshida, and install a more hawkish government led by Ichiro Hatoyama.

The CIA, in papers released under an act of Congress to declassify documents related to Japanese war crimes, said the plotters were led by Takushiro Hattori, a former private secretary to Gen. Hideki Tojo, the wartime prime minister hanged for war crimes in 1948.

Two CIA documents said the plot reportedly had the support of 500,000 people in Japan, and that the group planned to use a contact who controlled a faction inside the National Safety Agency -- a precursor to the Defense Ministry -- to help launch the coup.

The files reviewed by the AP strongly suggest the Americans were unaware of the plot until after it had been dropped. The plot was developed after the Occupation ended in April 1952, and the CIA files say American financial support for Hattori's group had dried up by then.

Still, the documentary evidence of the plot illustrates the violent potential of the rightwing, anticommunist cabal that had worked under the Occupation authority's G-2 intelligence wing in the early days of the Cold War in the late 1940s and early 50s. The CIA operated separately from G-2.

"Since the beginning of July 1952, plans for a coup d'etat have been initiated among a group of ex-purgees, including former military officers. The leader of the group is ex-Col. Hattori Takushiro," said an Oct. 31, 1952, report, which claimed, "this report is the first to mention a definite rightist plan involving violence.

"The original plan of the group was to engineer a coup d'etat, including the assassination of Prime Minister Yoshida Shigeru on account of his hostile attitude toward depurgees and nationalists," the CIA document said.

According to the document, Hattori colleague Masanobu Tsuji talked the group out of the coup, urging it to focus instead on countering the Socialist Party. The files say the group then decided it would not stage a coup as long as Yoshida's conservative Liberal Party remained in power.

However, the group still considered violence an option, the files say.

"The group is considering the possibility of some minor assassination attempt in lieu of a coup d'etat," the Oct. 31, 1952, document said.

Hattori and others had worked under the aegis of Maj. Gen. Charles Willoughby, the anticommunist G-2 chief. During the Occupation, Willoughby was considered the second-most powerful American after his boss, Gen. Douglas MacArthur.

Some group members were considered choice war crimes trial targets after the war.

Tsuji had been wanted for involvement in the Bataan Death March of 1942, in which thousands of Americans and Filipinos perished. Another group associate was Yoshio Kodama, a war profiteer and mob boss who was deeply involved in procuring materials -- often illegally -- for the Japanese military machine.

Neither of them was prosecuted for war crimes.

The Japanese militarists joined U.S.-supported missions to spy on communists in Japan, infiltrate agents into Soviet and North Korean territory, and recruit Japanese mercenaries to protect Taiwan from communist forces in mainland China, declassified documents show.

The CIA files, however, say the operations were riddled with intelligence leaks, hobbled by a lack of competent agents, and deeply compromised by rivalries among the rightists themselves. The agents' priorities, the documents say, were profits and an eventual resurgence of a militarist Japan.

The assassination plot detailed in the CIA files came at a difficult time for Hattori's group.

The departure of Willoughby from Japan in 1951 as the Occupation wound down deprived the rightists of their leading American patron and paymaster. Meanwhile, Yoshida was openly hostile to Hattori's push for rearmament.

"The government attitude toward the Hattori group has been increasingly antagonistic, and the group has lost influence since the departure of Gen. Willoughby," said a CIA document dated April 18, 1952.

Yoshida was pushed out of office peacefully in 1954 and replaced by Hatoyama, but the ultrarightist dream of resurrecting a militarist Japan never happened. The 1947 Constitution bars Japan from warfare and has never been amended.

Find the story at:
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20070306f3.html
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2007-03/01/content_816614.htm

This could have caused Japan to have a completely different history of coups, renewed militarism, multiple constitutions. I imagine it developing more like the post-war Philippines or South Korea. By now it would probably be a nuclear-armed anti-American economic basket-case. But who knows.

We almost had a coup in the United States during the FDR administration, courtesy of admirers and financers of Hitler such as Prescott Bush (Monkey Boy King's Grandfather).

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/2/27/112936/440

And in the course of researching something else, I found out about NATO "stay-behind" operations such as Operation Gladio, which funded a secret army of far-right wing parties, neofascist terrorists, paramilitaries, and cult groups in Europe.

I recall the Nixon-era saying, "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me." It's a depressing thought, but I wonder if I'm really not paranoid enough to imagine all of the perverse crap going on behind the scenes.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Suspected Actual Abraham Lincoln Quotes

I haven't been able to find old Abe arguing for hanging legislative opponents anywhere, but here are some possibly authentic quotes from him.

When I do good, I feel good; when I do bad, I feel bad, and that is my religion.

'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.

Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.

The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just.

Whatever you are, be a good one.

When you have got an elephant by the hind leg, and he is trying to run away, it's best to let him run.

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.

If I were two-faced, would I be wearing this one?

If this is coffee, please bring me some tea; but if this is tea, please bring me some coffee.

Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived.

He can compress the most words into the smallest ideas of any man I ever met.

Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power.

No man has a good enough memory to make a successful liar.

No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent.

Tact is the ability to describe others as they see themselves.

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
Sources:
http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Abraham_Lincoln
http://home.att.net/~howingtons/abe.html
http://home.att.net/~rjnorton/Lincoln78.html

Monday, February 26, 2007

Bots Model Language Evolution

Researchers in Switzerland have done an interesting experiment in language evolution. Part of the experiment involved evolving virtual robots in a kind of genetic algorithm, with the final stage consisting of physical-ized robots using the pre-evolved genome from the virtual genetic hothouse. The story is reported at the Telegraph,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2007/02/22/nrobot22.xml
while the original research abstract can be found at
http://www.current-biology.com/content/article/abstract?uid=PIIS0960982207009281

A summary of the findings is also reported at bitsofnews,
http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/5263/2/
where they have an embedded video of the bots , the file is swf
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-8821717259555472646&hl=en

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Congressional Nancy-Watch -or- Murtha, She Wrote

Moves continue, in the House of Reprehensibles and Sedatorial chambers, to end the war in Babylon and greater Mesopotamia, where the US sitting duck soldiers are dying for the lame duck's pride and daily strengthening the Persian empire as they do the dirty work for the Shia militias. This was the so-called New Way Forward (to death), which was not new, but same old same old, is not a "way" as it is not a method or a means to an ends, and is not "forward" either, as it is another step in the wrong direction, digging a deeper hole, our own soldiers' graves.

Ending an illegal war should not, in theory, be a difficult matter for the Congress, which can declare and fund or not fund wars, but the thin majority is so fractured that their pathetic efforts so far have faltered, betraying the wishes of the American majority who elected representatives to carry out the wish to end the war. Some say the congressional democrats have a "slow-bleed" strategy, death by a thousand legal paper cuts. In the Senate, Joe "traitor" Lieberman holds the Democratic majority hostage to his threats to defect to the other side if war funding is cut.

In their first effort, the Congress passed a non-binding resolution, imagining themselves as something more like a newspaper editorial board rather than the body which funds the United States government. Recent efforts documented in the Washington Post included a proposal that would require troops to have had a year's rest between deployments, have completed training, and to have been fully equipped before being deployed. This was apparently too radical for conservative Demograts and Republicants, who prefer to "support the troops" by forcing them to conduct the illegal war and occupation on extended deployments without adequate breaks, under-equipped, and improperly trained.

The newest effort, scheduled for this coming week, is to focus on the November 2002 resolution which authorized the pResident to use military force to find and remove weapons of mass destruction from Iraq and remove the dictator there, who had not renewed the US approval granted to other local dictatorships such as the House of Saud and Pervez Musharraf. Legislators have noticed that the resolution to find WMDs and remove Saddam no longer describes or justifies the current occupation. Good thinking, Sherlock.

Personally, I would favor stronger tactics, such as shutting down the government until you get your way, a method used by Newt Gingri(n)ch. His Repuglicant contract killers held the neoCongress for 12 years, demonstrating that the public will not necessarily disapprove of strong-arm tactics. Unfortunately, it seems that these kinds of options are closed to Democrats, who have a wide range of opinions and diverse members. Democrats risk giving themselves a wedgie if they use Rovean wedge-issue tactics.

Nancy Pelosi inexplicably said that "Impeachment is off the table". Impeachment should be served quickly, hot or cold, before the Republicans have another coup, with Supreme Court approval, and do to the Democrats what one Reprehensible from Alaska has threatened (in a fabricated Abraham Lincoln quote) -- arrest, hang, or exile them. They also need to act before a new war in Iran kills millions. The Bushies could provoke a nuclear counterattack of some kind, and use the event as an opportunity to declare a national emergency and arrest their opponents in Congress. (Congress has been a thorn in Dick's side ever since Flight 93 failed to hit the Capital as planned.) Instigating a war is so much more convenient for them than strengthening and renewing the nuclear non-proliferation pact, which requires the existing nuclear powers to gradually disarm. Extraordinary rendition also beats having to talk to your democratic opponents, who continue to have their own opinions, different from the deer leader's, in many cases.

Do the Democrats have alternative proposals for Iraq? They have made proposals, but let's make it simple: If there IS a military solution to Iraq, it can not be performed by the United States troops, who now have earned a reputation for rape, torture, and killing. If peacekeeping forces are needed, these should be United Nations peacekeeping forces. There is universal support for the United Nations leading the way, in polls done in Iraq, the U.S., and worldwide. This will require going to the UN on bended knee (and with open wallet) to apologize for headstrongness (stubborn pigheadedness) and attempt to redeem ourselves for our errors. The US troops are not on US territory in Iraq, and hence are not subject to US law, but to international law, which makes them, their commanders, and their enablers war criminals. Removing US troops doesn't necessarily mean abandoning the Iraqis to local sectarian warlords. As each American is withdrawn, five Bangladeshi blue-helmets could be moved in, for example, paid for by the US. The US has responsibilities, and a price must be paid, but the price is not necessarily US lives.

If the Congress can successfully force a US withdrawal, which seems unlikely before 2008, they should support US troops by increasing, possibly doubling their pay, insuring that veterans and soldiers have free lifelong medical care and free lifelong educational opportunities. Everybody deserves these benefits, but perhaps veterans deserve them most and least controversially.

The idea that the US could be a world policeman is taking a beating (not unlike the beating you would get at the hands of a Los Angeles cop if you are black). World respect for the US is probably at a 100-year low about now. The US rushed into Iraq when there was no crisis, but ignored genocide in Darfur and Rwanda, among other places. Even in the US, probably only a minority still support "World policeman" policies, perhaps 3% of the world population, but certainly not a majority. We do not earn respect from stationing troops overseas any more than the Soviets did by having troops in Vietnam or Cuba. The "assistance" which overseas US forces provide is primarily the killing of people by bombing or shooting them.

The United States should withdraw all troops stationed overseas which are not part of a United Nations or NATO agreement. It could be announced that US forces would begin a two-year process of withdrawal, but where an internationally-recognized public referendum finds a majority support keeping US forces, the withdrawal would stop and refresh to prior levels. In this way, a review of the global deployment of US troops would insure they are not stationed where they are unwanted, but if countries like Japan decided to keep the status quo, they could. Done quickly, this would weaken the hand monkey's paw, of the chimperor-in-brief.

Certain NATO deployments are poorly thought out and badly implemented, too. The near-100% support for the death penalty for converting to Christianity in Afghanistan shows that the values of the Afghan people are quite different from ours. (Their religious fanaticism is a different religion, mainly.) Negotiations should aim at creating a reformed Taliban as a political party competing for power democratically, not as a military force. We (NATO?) only require that they recognize democratic procedures and not harbor terrorists. The current deployment can never end as it is now conceived, and will eventually cause a bigger war. Similar progressive thinking created the Liberal Democratic Party in Japan and the Christian Democratic Party in Germany. As you will recall, the US did not stay and fight remnants of the defeated regime indefinitely. It is simply more practical to negotiate an end to it -- even if you do plan on stationing your troops there.

As we continue to see the solutions to world problems as being killing people, that mindset will eventually return home. If the solution to political problems in Iraq and Afghanistan were to kill people, why won't those solutions work in the US, some veterans may wonder, and apply their knowledge of guerrilla urban warfare to the US.

As I have said before, the Department of Defense is not really concerned with "defense", but is a ministry for foreign aggression. If it were "defense", its duties would overlap with "homeland security" --although I guess you could argue that "homeland" is an internal security ministry like the East German Stasi. One or both of these agencies should be abolished or radically downsized. The Pentagon is an interesting building that would make nice artists studios, a Peace Center campus, or some kind of multifunction center. If 300 million Americans with the world's strongest military cannot defeat a popular insurgency in a nation of 23 million, what would it take for someone to successfully defeat and occupy the United States? Clearly there is no threat to the United States now. The massive agency dedicated to sending millions of Americans overseas to defeat the Nazis went against the previous 150 years of American history, and is not appropriate now.

What can the US contribute to the world if not killing foreigners in its role as world policeman? America can be a leader in the United Nations again someday when its reputation is restored. The US can make an improved nuclear nonproliferation agreement to replace the broken-down old one, rather than threaten Iran for doing what the US did 50 years ago. People around the world respect the American educational system (universities and graduate schools, research institutions), technology, and medical technology, so we can build hospitals and universities around the world, and pay for their staff and professors. In places like Iraq, the lives saved by American hospitals and university-trained medical professionals would eventually overtake the number of people killed by the US invasion.

Progressive policies will probably not take place until the Kucinich administration takes office. In the meantime, the congressional nancy-watch continues. Will they find the means to stop the illegal war and occupation, or fail at that and be replaced by more gutsy Republicans, such as Chuck Hagel, in the next election.

The fact that Americans, unlike most (really all) other countries, have an agency that spends hundreds of billions of dollars -- over a thousand dollars for every man, woman, and child-- projecting military forces overseas to kill non-Americans, while they have no agencies (unlike many countries) to provide free medical care, lifelong free education, or free childcare services, says a lot about the values of Americans. The values projected are that it is more important to kill foreigners that they dislike than to educate, care for, or maintain the health of their own people. This is, of course, both unethical and uneconomical. These values do not arise naturally but are encouraged and expressed by the corporate culture. After the department of death is dismantled, simply replacing the anti-human spending with pro-human spending will not be enough. Republicant sympathizers in the military complex will have to be fed contracts for the maglev rail system that will connect our cities and the windmills, solar cells, and wave/tidal energy systems to power the grid.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

iBook RIP (2001-2007) (700 MHz, 30GB)


The patient died on the operating table. To be fair, it may have already been in a deep coma. This morning it had the pulsating light of sleep mode but wouldn't wake up from sleep or restart. It may have been the fault of the Ubuntu system; I don't know if it deals with sleep mode and takes commands from the power button correctly, as it didn't respect the Eject button, either. It just kept pulsating, so I disconnected the battery and began to operate. I had to run out to buy some tools. They are all very small. I used this site as my reference.

Things were going fairly well, although it was a little beyond my imagination, but I stalled at the point of dismantling the display, finding I didn't have the Allen wrench or Torq wrench of quite the right size. I thought it might be changed just by messing with the wires. I thought maybe it would work again at 90 or 120 degrees open, and I could just lock it down in that configuration somewhere. I was getting tired of it, and went for re-assembly.

No luck with the display, and it lost the little functionality it had. It is now displaying all the interactivity of a brick. In hindsight, I probably should have just hooked it up to an external monitor and let it be a stationary computer. It could have run OS X or even OS 9. Maybe I was too greedy, but it would have been nice if it had come back to life. Maybe it still will. I'll keep the lights on for it. In hell.

Oh, the memoryz. I remember how OS X froze the first hour I ever ran it. I reverted to OS 9 but it wouldn't accept an English system so I ran a Japanese OS 9 for several years. What was I thinking? I upgraded to 10.2 and 10.3 (English) to run the Java application that handled the Rio Karma. 10.2 was the first version of X to equal OS 9; 10.3 surpassed it.

I ended up with a few of the 40+ screws left over. It makes the iBook lighter, an engineering improvement. Actually, it tends to swell a little now that a few bits like the electromagnetic shield are not bolted down in 12 places. Maybe it's a good thing I didn't try to become a surgeon.

I did salvage the AirMac Card. Realized the slot iMacs need an adapter. Wondering if I have one around. Must check sock drawer.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Deeppresso-matic


Georgia DEEPRESSO coffee. From Coca-Cola. Seems like a potential marketing disaster to me, but what do I know? Coke is a big company, and they must have done their homework, like they did with the New Coke a few years ago.

Antique Gadgetry and Software

I recently downloaded a build of Ubuntu Linux to test-run as a Live-CD on my old 2001 iBook. Version 6.10 ran much better than 6.06, which I test-drove last summer. Touchpad movements moved the cursor normally, vigorously, not in millimeter increments, and the wireless card was recognized, loading the latest crazed astronaut news from BBC in Firefox. I would have installed the OS on the hard drive, just for the hell of it, but I would need to partition the hard drive. I had just reinstalled an impersonal version of Mac OS X 10.3 with none of my data, and various software, after cloning its personality into a MacBook and wiping iBook's drive, so I hesitate to partition it and start over on all that. This machine is being retired due to a fault in the screen, the dreaded screen-blacks-out-if-opened-wider than-45-degrees fault common to many of this model. It already had the defective logic card problem, and the delete key fell off and is taped on. Strangely, when running Ubuntu, the screen no longer blacked out when opened! What? So is it a software problem, not hardware? No, instead of blinking out instantly, the screen froze and slowly stepped down the contrast until it had grayed out completely and then went black. Different, but still bad. Perhaps part of the inferior power management of Ubuntu relative to Mac OS. So it is not that the power or signal to the screen shorts out, but that the wire that tells it that the lid is open shorts out. (?)

I am planning to take the iBook apart to fix the screen glitch. I may change the form of it, taping it (or nailing it?) to a piece of plywood, for example. It's not so much a repair mission as a dissection. Other possible uses besides experimenting with Ubuntu are to use it to pick up my wireless connection and share internet with my non-wireless iMacs upstairs, to run it in target disk mode to give an old Mac a bigger hard drive to use (30 gigs vs 6 on my candy iMacs), or to cannibalize it in some other way.

Practically speaking, I think the functionality and bundled iApps of the Mac OS are superior to what comes with Ubuntu, although Ubuntu is spiritually better. I hope the MacBook doesn't have all of the problems of the iBook, or I will abandon Apple for Ubuntu (when it gets a little better) on a Lenovo (or whatever). Apple should license their OS to at least a few other makers or models; one company can't cover all configurations. Apple has no ultracompacts, for example.

In other news of antique, defective, and broken gadgets, I found (when packing it up to throw it away) that I had purchased a 3-year warranty on the POS (Piece of Sh-crap) known as the Rio Karma when I purchased it in March, 2004! It was expensive, so I had figured I could use the insurance. Later, I was gifted with an iPod Shuffle (which I use every day) and an early generation of Nano (-still way underutilized-), so I stopped using the Karma, realizing I didn't need a big device with 20 gigs of music for everyday use. By the time it developed the battery defect, I had forgotten the warranty.

Although Rio as a music-player maker is out of business, it seems that I will be given a Rio Unite 130 2G, a device dating to 2005. It was a Japan-only product, and although it is only 2 gigs, has line-in and voice recording capability as described in English here. I see that the price was about the same as the Rio Karma was. I am looking forward to getting an actual working device with recording capabilities to replace to bad Karma that was collecting dust.

Update 20070216: I initialized the drive, again, and installed Ubuntu 6.10 on the iBook. I have other computers with Mac OS on them anyway. It is hard to judge it fairly when I can only open it 45 degrees, but it seemed to run well, and updated itself with lots of free software. In some ways it is better and more configurable than the Mac OS. However, the Music Player didn't work, crashed, and wouldn't import tracks from an mp3 cd. The CD tray had to be opened with a clip, as the open tray button didn't work. There is no Skype that runs on this version, either. There is a Skype for Debian flavors of Linux which should fit the bill, but maybe it is the PowerPC processor that it doesn't work with. With no iTunes, Skype, and CD tray problems, I'd say OS X or even 9 is better. I will leave the Ubuntu OS on until after the operation to dismantle it. Uli will be my guide.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Podcast Listening


I have long been listening to the Notes Underground music podcast. Podmeister Mitch recently mentioned the Matador mp3 collection, which was really well worth visiting. I also subscribe to NPR - All Songs Considered. I have added some new feeds in recent weeks to keep a stream or at least a trickle of new music in my ears:
KCRW - Today's Top Tune
KEXP Song of the Day
MPR - The Current Song of the Day
Indiefeed
Radio Three Sixty
NPR - Open Mic
I have finally retired NYUB - Not Your Usual Bollocks. I always found myself fast-forwarding through it. For a year. It is the usual bollocks. Or unusual bollocks, but not my kind of music. What was I thinking? Also retired Spacemusic but I think it died by itself first. You always think that someday you will actually listen to these or find a use for them. I archived some so that if I am ever hospitalized in a coma for a year or more, maybe someone could play them to me. I should leave someone a note.

In the news department, Democracy Now has no equal. It is strange to see how the podcast sphere went from no mainstream corporate media in mid 2005 to almost nothing but mainstream now. I am only speaking of the news sources now. You have to dig through the ABCs, CNNs, FOXes, CBS-walmarts, Newsweaks, and others to find Pacifica or anything non-corporate. I'm very bored with NPR - Most E-mailed Stories. Man, is that bad. Still not as dishonest as most of the other news reports, but very suburban topics such as Robert Plant's post-Zeppelin career as opposed to today's news of global destruction. I didn't get much out of the Washington Post, NYT, or BBC either. I guess I'd rather read them. Only Democracy Now is better listening than reading. (I'm too tired to link but you should search and subscribe in iTunes or another podcast-rss-feed-aggregator client.)

It's not NEWS, but Le Show is the best variety show or whatever you want to call it. Harry Shearer's regular voice features such as Dick Cheney Confidential and 41 calls 43 are the best. I am now adding Sam Seder of (just sold) AirAmerica after finding that Marc Maron is often on as a guest. I'll also give a listen to Ring of Fire. I can't stand Ed Schultz (but I would readily recommend him to anyone who likes the Rush Limbo "Limpboy" Experience as a low-fathead alternative).

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Cedar Pollen 杉の花粉 (Revenge of the Trees)

The sneezing and burning sensations in the nose and eyes, similar to low-level tear-gas or pepper spray exposure, which residents of Japan may feel beginning right about now is the conjunctivitis and rhinitis symptomatic of kafunsho, 花粉症, or pollenitis. This epidemic is the unfortunate result of a large-scale cedar reforestation miscalculation in the early post-war era which led to massive quantities of pollen per cubic centimeter. Dense stands of cedar-only forests covering 12% of the national land area led to production of absurd levels of pollen. Not only are they much denser than a natural forest, but being all the same species packed together causes each tree to vastly escalate its pollen production to compete with neighboring trees. At the same time, the population became highly sensitized to allergic reactions due to sanitation (i.e. nobody has worms anymore, which gave a natural protection against kafunsho). It has been found to affect monkeys, too.

I have added some quick kafun 花粉 (pollen) reference items to the sidebar for quick reference, with a bias toward Kanto, Tokyo and Chiba, although navigating up a level from http://yklt.kafun-info.jp/html/kanto_s.html to http://yklt.kafun-info.jp/html/ will get you to a national pollen map courtesy of Yakult(!?), for example. This kafunsho season, not unlike a protracted cold, will last from mid-February to early May. Sometimes you can see the thick clouds of pollen blowing off the trees, or you can see it on the windshield of a car or anywhere where it would gather such as a windowsill. They look to be about 30 microns (30,000 nanometers) wide. Maybe. Here are some magnified pictures at 2500X. Here's an electron microscope image from here. Right is a picture from an Osaka government site.

I use a variety of methods to cope. First of all, the prophylactic principle is most effective. This means wearing a surgical mask to block as much pollen as possible. That cuts the symptoms by
25-75%. Next, eat all the pills your doctor gives you. This will have the unfortunate effect of making you borderline narcoleptic, able to sleep on a dime at anytime by just closing your eyes, if you aren't that tired already. That induced drowsiness is nice; since you feel miserable anyway, who needs consciousness? A third way to fight the pollen is with eye drops and nasal spray. I checked out the eye drops and found they were made of the usual anti-red-eye ingredient, the name of which I have forgotten. I found that the active ingredient of my nasal spray was hydrochloric acid. When your sinuses are completely blocked, yet oozing nasal mucus profusely, hydrochloric acid seems like it may be just the thing. I'll trust the judgment of the medical community. I would like to have some goggles since my eyes itch like crazy. I have often thought that oxygen tanks and an oxygen mask wouldn't really be such a bad idea. It could actually be an improvement on the surgical mask and goggles to have a transparent glass oxygen mask, or just go all the way and cover the head with a transparent helmet with positive air pressure from a clean supply. This would interfere with eating and drinking, but keep pollen out of your hair, too. You would want to take it off occasionally. If it were made lighter, either a gauzy veil-like envelope or a clear plastic type resembling a plastic bag over the head, that would have some advantages, too.

The very best solution is rain. Rain cleanses the air of all the organic and inorganic crap. If it rains, you get immediate relief. You will know when you wake up if the rain has stopped or started. Wind is the worst. I'll be hoping for rain until May. Last year, the rainy season began from May (instead of June).

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Book Notes

I read this book review in the Daily Yomiuri on Saturday and ordered the book from Amazon right away. It came the next day, Sunday. I have only spent an hour or two looking at the pictures and reading it, but I can recommend it as being even a little too effective at evoking the atmosphere and associative complexes of late Tokugawa and Meiji Japan. It took me a few days to stop seeing the Tokugawa world embedded in the Heisei and upon which the 20th and 21st century technologies are hung like Christmas tree ornaments. This book should be read in small, controlled doses to avoid synchronic reality distortion. The stereoscopic images are a favorite of mine; I always appreciated the embedding of an extra dimension in media. It was an interesting time to live but violent and unpleasant, overall, as I vibe it. So much progress has been made has changed, especially in the last fifty years. The book is Photography in Japan: 1853-1912, by Terry Bennett. You will want to have it in the cellulosic carbon form, at least until Google Books makes it available as a hi-def e-book around 2011. But even then….

I also recently stumbled across Chapter 17 (?) of 1984 on the web and had to read that. I haven't read 1984 since the 1970s (or maybe 1980s). The entire book is online at Mondo Politico. As I reread Chapter One, I noticed it could stand alone as a short story. The exposition and construction of the fictional world is my favorite part of both film and literature, and by the end of Chapter One, you are there. However, you assume that the police will be at the door, so it could be interpreted as the end. Well, the full novel just stretches that ending out, doesn't it? Eric Blair is a very 1990s-sounding name, by the way, I understand why he felt the need to use "George Orwell" as a pen name, for its evocation of decaying imperialist period. Had he stuck with his original name, "Orwellian" as an adjective would have never come into existence, replaced instead by "Blairian", which would have posed a political hurdle for Tony Blair. Imagine a candidate named "Orwell". But perhaps people don't really notice the surname; nobody thinks of Kate Bush and George Bush in the same sentence, for example.

Speaking of books, I was thinking…

New hybrid forms of literature currently under development:
litterature: Nonbiodegradable reading matter left in an inappropriate location.
unliterature: Literature composed in the dark, in poorly illuminated locations, as was the case with Abe Lincoln, or by persons who are not so bright themselves.
illiterature: Reading materials for illiterates. I'm not sure what that means.
cliterature: Pornographic literature.
obliterature: Great literature that we have never seen because it was destroyed.
gliterature: Not to be confused with glitterature!
glitterature: Not to be confused with gliterature!
quitterature: Slacker writings. Generally, these are unfinished works or notes.
spliterature: Secessionist writings, or writing done while seeking a divorce.
flitterature: writing which leaps from one topic to another with a surrealistic organization. Flitterature seeks to convey a butterfly-like approach to the world, and to the best of my knowledge, hasn't emerged yet.

Babelizer first run

Babelizer is an interesting piece of MacOS software that translates from Language A to Language B and back again until the mutations stop.

Babelizer is a toy that humorously exposes the inadequacy of machine translation. You type in a phrase, choose a language, and the Babelizer uses the Altavista translation web site to translate between English and your chosen language until the result no longer mutates.
I tried the classic Machine Translation samples of folklore, "Out of sight, out of mind" and "The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak." I was unable to generate "Invisible idiot" or "Th e liquor is agreeable but the meat has gone bad," but I had the following results. (You should have Unicode encoding…)
Out of sight, out of mind.

出於視域, 在頭腦外面。
Stemming from sight, outside brains.
源於視域, 外部腦子。
Source to sight, exterior brain.
來源看見, 外部腦子。
The origin sees, exterior brain.
起源看見, 外部腦子。
The origin sees, exterior brain.

마음에서 광경에서.
From mind from spectacle.
가관에서 마음에서.
From spectacle from mind.
마음에서 가관에서.
From mind from spectacle.

Da vista, dalla mente.
From sight, the mind.
Da vista, la mente.
From sight, the mind.

Hors de la vue, hors de l'esprit.
Out of the sight, of the spirit.
Hors de la vue, de l'esprit.
Out of the sight, spirit.
Hors de la vue, esprit.
Out of the sight, spirit.

Από τη θέα, από το μυαλό.
From the view, from the brain.
Από την άποψη, από τον εγκέφαλο.
From the opinion, from the brain.
Από την άποψη, από τον εγκέφαλο.

心からの視力から。
From vision from heart.
中心からの視野から。
From range of vision from center.
中心からの視野の範囲から。
From range of range of vision from center.

Fuera de vista, fuera de la mente.
Outside Vista, the mind.
Fuera de Vista, la mente.
Outside Vista, the mind.

I like the Spanish "Outside Vista" and the Chinese "Exterior brain" the best. If we could just pair those two halves up…. Meanwhile, back at "The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.":
El alcohol está dispuesto pero la carne es débil.
The alcohol is arranged but the meat is weak.
Se arregla el alcohol pero la carne es débil.
The alcohol is fixed but the meat is weak.
El alcohol es fijo pero la carne es débil.
The alcohol is fixed but the meat is weak.

정신은 기꺼이 한다 그러나 살은 약하다.
The spirit puts out the flag and omits the flesh but it does.
정신은 밖으로 깃발을 두고 살을 생략한다 그러나.
The spirit the flag lets at the outside and it will live it omits but.
깃발이 외부에 시키는 정신 그것 생략한다 그러나 살.
Spirit it the flag makes outside it omits the flesh.
정신 깃발이 밖에 그것을 만들는 그것은 살을 생략한다.
Only the spirit flag will make it it omits the flesh.
단 정신 깃발은 살을 생략하는 그것을 만들l 것이다.
Only the spirit flag the l thing which will make it it omits the flesh.

精神は喜んでであるが、肉は弱い。
Mind is rejoicing,, but the meat is weak.
心は、喜んでいるが、肉は弱い。
You rejoice heart,, but the meat is weak.
中心を、喜ばせるが、肉は弱い。
You make the center rejoice, but the meat is weak.
中心を喜ばせるが肉は弱い。
You make the center rejoice, but the meat is weak
Το πνεύμα είναι πρόθυμο αλλά η σάρκα είναι αδύνατη.
The spirit is willing but the flesh is impossible.
Το πνεύμα είναι πρόθυμο αλλά η σάρκα είναι αδύνατη.

De geest is gewillig maar het vlees is zwak.
The spirit is willing but flesh is weak.
De geest is gewillig maar het vlees is zwak.

Der Geist ist bereit, aber das Fleisch ist schwach.
The spirit is ready, but the flesh is weak.
Der Geist ist bereit, aber das Fleisch ist schwach.
Greek has a tendency to exaggerate here, "weak" becoming "impossible". Only Dutch spits it back unmangled. German doesn't whack it too bad, either. Japanese seems happy that you've shown everyone at the Center a good time, while Korean takes it to another astral plane where spirit flags the I thing and omits the flesh. Fair warning to anyone relying on MT to take a look at the round trip result and see if that indicates that the intended message may have survived the first translation. Of course, even a perfect return result doesn't guarantee an unintended meaning in the L2.

Monday, January 29, 2007

End the American Occupation of Iraq

We know that the American public wants out of Iraq.
We know that the Iraqi public believes that Americans make the security situation worse, and 71% want the Americans to leave within a year.
Polls of US troops in Iraq have shown that 72% wanted out within a year.
Most members of the US House and Senate would like to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq, or are at least not in favor of an increase. To my disappointment, the Congressional Nancys have not yet taken a strong stand.
Generals in the US military said troops should be withdrawn.
Jim Baker and members of the Republican elites in the US want to get troops out of Iraq.
It was reported last week that even Prime Minister Maliki asked Bush to pull US troops out of Baghdad.
Then, there is the rest of the world, too.
It is getting harder to find supporters for keeping the troops in Iraq, aside from Osama binLaden, George W. Bush, Mister Vice President Cheney, Tony BLiaR, and John Howard of Australia.
The Nancys in the House of Reprehensibles must shut down the war machine before it starts in on Iran. The war has been so painless and profitable for Bush and cronies that they think they can still abuse their access and control of the military to ambush Iran. Americans need to insure that Bush feels their pain and the pain of the Iraqis who receive American "aid".

Update 20070131: As a grammar note for the syntax-conscious, note in the text of the AFP wire service article how the writer uses "more bold" as the comparitive form of the adjective rather than the "bolder" which was in use a few years ago. I hear these every day; the suffix "-er" is being regularized with "more". It appears that English may be becoming more of an isolating language and less of an inflecting language.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Happy Birthday

January 27 is the birthday of Margo Timmins of the Cowboy Junkies, among other musicians. I was looking at Wikipedia list of people born on January 27 and noticed that there were many musicians.

I shouldn't count these ancient greats that I cherry-picked from earlier centuries.

1756 - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Austrian composer (d. 1791)
1885 - Jerome Kern, American composer (d. 1945)
1885 - Eduard Künneke, German composer (d. 1953)
1885 - Harry Ruby, American musician (d. 1974)
1908 - Oran "Hot Lips" Page, American musician (d. 1954)
1918 - Skitch Henderson, English bandleader (d. 2005)
1918 - Elmore James, American blues musician (d. 1963)
1919 - Ross Bagdasarian, American musician (d. 1972)
1920 - Helmut Zacharias, German violinist (d. 2002)
1930 - Bobby Blue Bland, American singer
1937 - John Ogdon, English pianist (d. 1989)
1944 - Nick Mason, English musician (Pink Floyd)

Just look at the 1960s:

1961 - Margo Timmins, Canadian singer (Cowboy Junkies)
1961 - Gillian Gilbert, British musician (New Order)
1964 - Bridget Fonda, American actress
1967 - Bobby Deol, Indian actor
1968 - Mike Patton, American singer (Faith No More)
1968 - Tricky, English rapper
1969 - Cornelius, musician (Flipper's Guitar)
1969 - Michael Kulas, Canadian singer/songwriter (James (band))
1969 - Bobby Deol , Indian Actor


Of these people born on January 27 in the 1960s, 6 out of 9 people noted in the Wikipedia, nearly 70%, were musicians. The pattern is a little different if you look at a longer timespan.

1970 - Jon Douglas Rainey, Actor/Host of It Takes a Thief
1970 - Mark Trojanowski, American musician (Sister Hazel)
1971 - Fann Wong, Singapore entertainer (Shanghai Knights)
1972 - Keith Wood, Irish rugby player
1974 - Chaminda Vaas, Sri Lankan cricketer
1976 - Clint Ford, American voice actor
1976 - Ahn Jung-Hwan, Korean football player
1979 - Daniel Vettori, New Zealand cricketer
1979 - Rosamund Pike, British actress
1980 - Marat Safin, Russian tennis player
1981 - Alicia Molik, Australian tennis player
1981 - Josh Groban, American Singer
1983 - Carlo Colaiacovo, Canadian hockey player
1987 - Lily Donaldson, British model
1988 - Kerlon Moura Souza, Brazilian footballer


Sports comes up to about 50%, with only one musician mentioned.

I thought that maybe they just had a lot of musicians in the database. So I compared it with another date, July 21.

1960 - Lance Guest, American actor
1960 - Fritz Walter, German footballer
1961 - Amar Singh Chamkila, Punjabi folk singer
1961 - "Big" Jim Martin, American musician (Faith No More)
1963 - Kevin Poole, English footballer
1964 - Jens Weißflog, German ski jumper
1965 - Gudni Bergsson, Icelandic footballer
1968 - Brandi Chastain, American soccer player
1968 - Lyle Odelein, Canadian hockey player
1969 - Emerson Hart, American musician (Tonic)
1970 - Shawn Stasiak, American professional wrestler
1971 - Nuno Markl, Portuguese comedian and radio host
1978 - Josh Hartnett, American actor
1979 - David Carr, American football player
1979 - Tamika Catchings, American basketball player
1980 - C.C. Sabathia, American baseball player
1981 - Titus Bramble, English footballer
1981 - Stefan Schumacher, German cyclist
1981 - Veronica Belmont, CNET TV personality
1982 - Claudette Ortiz, American soul singer
1983 - Eivør Pálsdóttir, Faroese singer
1983 - Kellen Winslow II, American football player
1984 - Liam Ridgewell, English footballer
1985 - Von Wafer, American basketball player


This set had 15 athletes out of 24, almost 60% athletes, with football, soccer, and basketball heavily represented. Musicians were only 5, counting singers, about 20%.

It looks like there really are tendencies for certain dates to favor certain occupational outcomes (as astrologers worldwide have suggested for millenia).

Possible alternative explanations:? Randomness? Or it could depend on who uploaded the data. Maybe a sports freak was working on one day, while a music fan beat the sports person to the punch on another date, but I don't think so. As evidence for certain tendencies to occur on certain days, notice that three great composers were born on the same day in 1885.

Friday, January 26, 2007

Road to Hell Paved with Black Ice, Hearts Warmed by Heat-Ray Gun

The Pentagon now has a new ray-gun to fire at civilians in order to cause them excruciating pain should they attempt to exercise their democratic rights to assemble. The new tool should also come in handy at Guantanamo Bay, and may eventually find its way into consumer electronic applications like the taser before it, and be used indiscriminately to discipline small children.

In a related story, the military is working hard to develop all-weather artificial black ice to slip up enemies and cause them to fall down laughing so they can be easily shot. Maxwell Smart would be proud of the Polymer Ice Project. There is not enough plastic pollution around now, and this may divert attention away from the ugly depleted uranium situation by providing comic relief.

One really doesn't see a lot of public clamor or demand for either of these technologies. You have to wonder how these were able to leapfrog over the solar/plugin flexfuel hybrid vehicle or a cure for stupidity.

I think it is time for us to go back to the ideals the country was built on, and abolish standing armies and the Pentagon, to the extent that is possible. The President was never intended to be a permanent "Commander-in-Chief" with a huge army at his private disposal. Armies were only to be raised by an act of Congress, and then dissolved. Having an army to throw around has caused a lot of trouble. The Department of Defense is a euphemism for the Ministry of Aggressive Foreign Wars. If it were really "defense", its duties would overlap with the hideously titled "homeland security" ministry. We should strive to abolish the military and its obscene and immoral waste, channelling those resources into more productive enterprises. Defense should take the form it has in Switzerland, an armed and trained populace ready to defend their liberty. Switzerland has not faced invasion, and neither has Costa Rica. As I read the Second Amendment, which was crafted in that pre-standing army era, persons bearing guns were to be the nation's army. That was it. That was to be the militia, and any excursionary force would need to be created temporarily by the Congress. Reviving this spirit, gun owners should automatically be enrolled in the national self-defense forces, and be required to undergo training in the proper use of their weapon and the tactics to be employed in the event of an invasion.

The only American politician I know of who is thinking along the same lines, looking at the big picture, and talking sensibly of eliminating the Department of Defense is Dennis Kucinich.

Monday, January 22, 2007

One Flew Over the Homeland

Jose Padilla is an American citizen who was held for 1,307 days in solitary confinement in a military prison in South Carolina. He has suffered interrogation, sleep deprivation, and torture. He has more or less lost his mind by now. Keep in mind that most people crack and confess to whatever is asked of them in the first 24 hours of interrogations. The Justice Department of John Ashcroft once claimed that he was plotting to detonate a radioactive "dirty" bomb, but admitted they had no evidence, and later abandoned that accusation.

Reuters news article by Jane Sutton dated Sun Jan 21, 11:17 AM ET

Padilla was kept in a 9-by-7-foot (3-by-2-metre) cell, the lone occupant in a two-story, 10-unit block, defense lawyer Andrew Patel wrote in an affidavit. The windows were blocked so no light could enter and meals, often cold, were delivered through a slot in the door, Patel said.

Interrogators ordered his pillow and foam mattress removed, forcing Padilla to sleep on a bare steel platform.

Padilla was kept without a clock, calendar or reading material, sometimes for long periods in darkness, and other times for long periods under bright light. He was subjected to extreme cold, deprived of sleep, chained in painful positions and drugged with what he believed to be "truth serum," the documents alleged.

For the first two years, he was not allowed to speak with a lawyer nor send or receive mail, except for a brief note sent to his mother in Florida through the International Committee of the Red Cross.

A comment from a doctor, in the second sentence of the news story:
He is a bit paranoid and believes the government is persecuting him, "but this does not appear to be delusional," wrote one of doctors who examined the alleged al Qaeda operative in a Miami prison cell at his lawyers' request.
In other words, just because he's paranoid doesn't mean the government's not out to get him.

Note the gratuitous use of the term "alleged al Qaeda operative" in the news story. I'm not sure that the government is even alleging that anymore. His main crime now seems to be being a gangbanger who converted to Islam, and visiting Egypt and Pakistan. What more do they need to know? Prosecutors say Padilla is "not entitled to a free pass." It's hard to believe that this is the country where I grew up, but that is a snapshot of life in America in the noughties, where civil rights have fallen to the bottom of the world, looking more like Algeria, Egypt, or Sudan now.

Due to post-traumatic stress disorder, Jose may never be capable of holding a job. The government that slowly and deliberately took his mind should support his rehabilitation now.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/usa_padilla_dc

Thursday, January 18, 2007

A Surge of Death as the Empire Marches On

Interesting points of view from Frontline and www.socialistworker.org.

Frontline:

At some point, inexplicably, his U.S.-paid executioners raised slogans in praise of Moqtada al-Sadr, the young Shia cleric whom the Americans hate the most and have often fought, in Kufa and elsewhere. Saddam is said to have been surprised and shook his head. Soon after that he was led to the gallows, tied up, and hanged. That was on December 30. The next day, the very last day of 2006, The New York Times began its story on the execution with the sentence: "Saddam Hussein never bowed his head, until his neck snapped."

It wasn't long before Washington began waking up to the huge global impact of Saddam's dignified behaviour, as contrasted with the crassness of his execution - the choice of day, the menacing rowdiness of his executioners in the solemn moments before his death, the snapping of the neck as he prayed silently. Such things are hard to verify, but it does seem to me that it is only after the facts had had an impact exactly the opposite of what the Washingtonian spinmasters anticipated that they decided to pretend that the successive videos had been produced clandestinely and that they had actually tried to dissuade the "sovereign" Nouri al-Maliki government from executing Saddam on such a holy day.

It was now said that it was the "sovereign" Iraqi establishment - much too "sovereign" to listen to the United States - which had chosen that day, against strenuous U.S. efforts. It was also claimed that the slogans raised by the executioners in favour of Moqtada al-Sadr were entirely spontaneous; that they were praising someone the U.S. detests only goes to show, it was claimed, how "independent" those executioners really were. Supposedly liberal but in fact corrupt and pompous senior journalists like John F. Burns of The New York Times were to play a major role in this subsequent campaign of disinformation which sought to relieve the U.S. of its culpability in the whole sorry mess.

All that, I believe, is plain hogwash. Only a month earlier, that same "Prime Minister" had complained publicly that he is not allowed to move even a platoon of policemen without prior U.S. permission. Death by hanging of a famous dictator is serious business; it is very doubtful that sundry hangmen can just take out their cellphones and video cameras to make unauthorised tapes and then just put them on the Internet. Secrecy is the essence of all such events; it is very unlikely that microscopic details of such proceedings can appear in newspapers the very next day if the real masters of the ceremony, the big U.S. officials, do not want them divulged. Nor is it very likely that hired hangmen, always fearful of dire consequences for unruly behaviour at such times, would raise slogans in favour of America's designated enemy, Moqtada, unless they are sure of not suffering any reprisals. It seems very likely that they were instructed to raise those slogans, in praise of Moqtada, to be caught on videotape that would be widely disseminated throughout the Arab world, to indicate that it was Moqtada's men who actually executed Saddam Hussein, so as to concentrate Sunni ire on Moqtada, the one major Shia figure in Iraq who is deeply opposed to American occupation, and not on the core clients of the U.S. who actually did it.

The hanging as well as the spectacle staged and taped at the time were meant to exacerbate the Shia-Sunni divide and to have the Sunnis turn against Moqtada even as the U.S. concentrates its fire upon his forces. (As many as 14,000 U.S. troops were diverted to Moqtada's stronghold in the Sadr City zone of Baghdad in October 2006 and the majority of the 30,000 troops that Bush and his new commanders in Iraq are looking for are expected to be deployed there.)

It seems very likely, in short, that the Americans had carefully choreographed the whole staging of the execution and dissemination of the pictures, but they had not imagined that Saddam's dignified conduct would have such an electrifying impact across the world, especially the Arab-Muslim world. Nor had they understood that most people in the world, especially outside the U.S., do not condone the hanging of a man on a day deemed holy in his religion and while he has his last prayer on his lips, even though the man to be hanged was once a dictator.
That has an eerie ring of truth to it. It also makes me wonder if I'm just not paranoid enough. Leaving the deconstruction of signifiers on the intellectual and spiritual planes for a moment for an analysis of the material relations underlying the Iraq situation, we take you to the Socialist Worker:
THE U.S. war on Iraq was never about freedom, and it has been anything but moderate.

Take a look, for example, at the assortment of crooks and thugs the U.S. proposed to lead the “new” Iraq--after, that is, it gave up on direct colonial rule through the Coalition Provisional Authority.

The U.S. is no more committed to democracy elsewhere in the Middle East, where its favored ally Israel presides over an apartheid system designed to crush all aspirations of the Palestinian people, and where its clients among Arab regimes use dictatorial repression to maintain their grip on power.

So what has the U.S. war been about? Oil, for one thing--U.S. control over the world’s second-largest proven reserves.

The Bush surge comes at a critical time for his oil company pals, who are counting on the Iraqi government to deliver on a new oil law, expected to be voted on in the coming weeks and put in effect by March.

The law--“carefully scrutinized,” wrote Pepe Escobar in Asia Times, “by Washington, Big Oil and the International Monetary Fund, but not by Iraqi politicians”--would establish 30-year production-sharing agreements with Western oil companies and bar any future government from nationalizing the oil industry. “In essence, it’s a game of ‘if you nationalize, we invade you--again.’” Escobar concludes. “So the law fulfills the early-2003 neo-con boast of ‘we are the new OPEC.’”

Beyond oil, Iraq is the centerpiece of U.S. plans to project its military power in the Middle East through the establishment of permanent bases--and “to maintain the legitimacy of U.S. imperialism, which needs the pretext of a global war on terror to justify further military intervention, expanded military budgets, concentration of executive power and restrictions on civil liberties,” wrote Anthony Arnove, author of Iraq: The Logic of Withdrawal, in the International Socialist Review.

Those who really are on the side of freedom need to speak out for immediate U.S. withdrawal--and for the right of Iraqis to determine their own future.
Both of these long articles are recommended reading. Just some snippets are presented here. They may help you fall asleep, but I can't say what kind of dreams they may inspire.

Monday, January 15, 2007

The George W. Bush Memorial Library at Abu Ghraib

Some controversy has apparently arisen over the legacy of George W. Bush and the handful of documents that he intends to use to dedicate his proposed future "Presidential Library". Some worry that proposed plans to place the library at Southern Methodist University in Dallas will further cement the city's ugly reputation for killing Kennedy and encouraging Bushes. Residents fear the building may become an attractive target for terrorists. I haven't googled this to see if anyone else has made the suggestion, so they probably have, like that "50 Ways to Leave Iraq" idea that I was thinking about, but how about Abu Ghraib? Locating the George W. Bush pRedsiDenTal Lieberry in Abu Ghraib will send a bold message that this pRedsident idn't afeard to think outside the box, and will form an appropriate and lasting dedication to his legacy.

They might as well make an amusement park out of it and have an animatronic Saddam Hussein hung on a simulated gallows. Lieberrys are so dull, ya know, they need something for the kids…

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Thursday, January 04, 2007

President Edwards?

John Edwards recently declared his candidacy for the 2008 Democratic nomination. Edwards won the 2004 Iowa caucuses, and has leaped to the top of Iowa polls again, ahead of all Democratic candidates except Obama, who he is tied with.
In 2004, I was disappointed by Edward's weakness in the Vice-Presidential Candidates Debate. Edwards seemed reluctant to abandon his nice-boy persona and rip into Cheney as, for example, Bill Clinton might have done. Now, however, as I re-read the debate, it seems that Edwards certainly held his own. It seems that in text, Edwards did well, while on camera, Cheney was quite strong. Cheney tried to appear as an experienced elder scolding and shaming Edwards as a mediocre politician who rarely even bothered to attend the Senate. As with Cheney's "Go F*ç% Yourself" remark to Patrick Leahy, the subject of Halliburton was the topic that set off the counterattack:

CHENEY: Gwen, I want to go back to the last comment, and then I'll come back to Israel-Palestine.
The reason they keep trying to attack Halliburton is because they want to obscure their own record.
And Senator, frankly, you have a record in the Senate that's not very distinguished. You've missed 33 out of 36 meetings in the Judiciary Committee, almost 70 percent of the meetings of the Intelligence Committee. You've missed a lot of key votes: on tax policy, on energy, on Medicare reform.
Your hometown newspaper has taken to calling you "Senator Gone." You've got one of the worst attendance records in the United States Senate. Now, in my capacity as vice president, I am the president of Senate, the presiding officer. I'm up in the Senate most Tuesdays when they're in session. The first time I ever met you was when you walked on the stage tonight.
Edwards responded with, "That was a complete distortion of my record. I know that won't come as a shock."

It later came out that Edwards in fact had an excellent voting record, although his attendance had dropped off during the presidential campaign. At least three pictures of Cheney with Edwards surfaced, proving that Cheney's claim to have met Edwards for the first time during the debate was a bald-faced lie, and it was shown that Cheney had presided over the Senate twice, not "most Tuesdays".

Looking back at the TV and text experiences of the debate, Mr Cheney appealed to the Reptilian brainstem, while Edwards was a soft fuzzy Mammalian thinker.

In the 2008 campaign, voters will face a very real, even surreal choice, between the Reptilian Party platform, calling for the immediate extermination of all mammalian life on Earth, and the Demagogic Party platform, which seeks the establishment of a one-world utopian hive-mind cyber-dictatorship. Choose wisely. If you vote for a third party, you are just helping the greater of two evils to win.

Plan to Fail

It seems to me that Bush is not actually intending for a troop "surge" in Iraq but is choosing to promote a plan that has no chance of being approved by Congress in order to be able to say that he had a plan to win, but his opponents wouldn't let him fight to win. I may be misoverestimating the pRedisent's intelligence with an "I wudda whupped Iraq's ass but the liberals wouldn't let me" scheme; the poor fool may have just painted himself into a political corner and up the walls. It doesn't seem to appeal to many people now but could be revived as a myth in a future electoral cycle when people have forgotten what was happening in 06 and 07. Democrats should quickly put the "surge" out of its misery.

And what is this story about a Pentagon plan to go to war with Moqtada al-Sadr's Mehdi Army?